Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Return to Comments
Standards of Conduct--Reproposed NPRM
Type: Regulation
Federal Register Document Type: Reproposed
Description:
Revise existing standards of conduct regulations in Subpart A, Part 612, and consider a more principle-based rule to facilitate a sound standards of conduct program at System institutions.


Text of Comment Letter
June 20, 2014



Mr. Barry F. Mardock

Deputy Director

Office of Regulatory Policy

Farm Credit Administration

1501 Farm Credit Drive

McLean, VA 22102-5090



Dear Mr. Mardock:



Thank you for the opportunity to comment on FCA's recent proposed rule regarding Standards of Conduct. As a director of Farm Credit Services of America, I am personally committed to maintaining high standards of conduct, and I know my association is as well. It would appear that the Agency hasdesigned this regulation with the goal of discouraging active farmers from running for the board of a Farm Credit institution. That just makes no sense and it needs to be fixed.



At our feedlot we may want to buy feed such as corn or hay (or even feeder cattle) from other producers, these types of transactions will not be possible if prior approval is required. One load of cattle now can require $150,000.




As a director, I find the transaction disclosure requirements in the Conflicts of Interest section of the proposed rule to be unduly burdensome, unnecessary and inappropriate. Our board has delegated to management specific loan making authority, and we do not have any role in approving individual loans or the terms of loans. It is unreasonable for me to be put in a position of having to know whether I am doing business with an association customer or not.



I routinely have business transactions with a wide variety of individuals, some of whom might be association customers. Even in instances when I know I’m dealing with an association customer, there is no conflict of interest since I have no role in making individual loan decisions.



The proposed disclosure requirements would require me to report and obtain pre-approval of transactions within my farming operation. This is an unrealistic burden to place on directors with no corresponding benefit. What happens when those I do business with become aware of these reporting requirements? Aren’t they going to be concerned about the confidentiality of their business dealings with me?



I urge the FCA to revise substantially the proposed rule or consider withdrawing it. As drafted it is counterproductive, creating inappropriate, unreasonable standards that are inconsistent with modern farming operations. Thank you for your consideration.



Sincerely,



John Reisch

23379 434th Ave.

Howard S.D. 57349

Director
Farm Credit Services of America
605-360-5845


**********************************************************************
This communication may contain privileged information intended solely for the recipient. It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not Farm Credit Services of America. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.



Attachments: