Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Return to Comments
Standards of Conduct--Reproposed NPRM
Type: Regulation
Federal Register Document Type: Reproposed
Description:
Revise existing standards of conduct regulations in Subpart A, Part 612, and consider a more principle-based rule to facilitate a sound standards of conduct program at System institutions.


Text of Comment Letter

May 20, 2014


Mr. Barry F. Mardock  

Deputy Director

Office of Regulatory Policy

Farm Credit Administration

1501 Farm Credit Drive

McLean, VA 22102-5090

 

RE:Standards of Conduct – RIN 3052-AC44 / Federal Register 79 (February 20, 2014) 9649-9661

Dear Mr. Mardock,

This is written to provide you with a direct comment letter to augment the GreenStone Farm Credit Services (“Association”) and Farm Credit Council (“letters which provided collaborative observations concerning the proposed rule.   We feel it is critical that you understand the potential impact of this Proposed Rule on the Association and the role we serve as a director.

As a current elected director serving the Association, we have been fully informed about the importance of the Standard of Conduct regulations, acknowledge the requirements annually, and act accordingly in good faith to make the appropriate disclosures when required.   With or without the rule, it hasalways been our intention to act within a manner that is of the highest ethical standards and without conflict of interest.  This is not to say that regulations prescribing conduct is not necessary, but rather that those in service to the Farm Credit System should naturally be expected to act with the highest ethical standards as part of who we are in service.

With respect to the proposed rule for additional prescription on standards of conduct, there are many aspects of the technical rule that create challenges.  While we certainly would do everything possible to support maintaining an environment of promoting, encouraging and enforcing the highest ethical standards, the regulation itself appears to create confusion, lack of clarity and ambiguity in the very standards we all want to see instilled.  The present regulation appears adequate and complete, allowed for the building of consistent practices with clarity, and has presented a focus purpose.  Therefore, adapting the new proposed regulation in its entirety may undermine the very purpose and process for the existing standards of conduct protocol.  

We suggest you consider targeted revisions to the existing regulation rather than the broad sweeping changes within the proposed rule.   Of particular concern to me as a farmer director is the overly burdensome structure of the regulation in terms of reporting, tracking and materiality standards. Further, the application of the regulation to outside agents without clearer definitions will certainly make it more difficult to administer and do business.

I am appreciative to have the opportunity to provide a comment to the proposed regulation on such an important topic, and hope that my suggestion to not over regulate a matter that is already core to our fabric of our Association and fundamental nature.  The existing regulations have served us well.

Sincerely,

 

Cathy Webster, Director

GreenStone Farm Credit Services

 

 

 

 


Sent from my iPad




The information contained in this transmission is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, do not disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and then delete it. Thank you for your cooperation.


 

Attachments: