Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.


The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Return to Comments
Standards of Conduct--Reproposed NPRM
Type: Regulation
Federal Register Document Type: Reproposed
Revise existing standards of conduct regulations in Subpart A, Part 612, and consider a more principle-based rule to facilitate a sound standards of conduct program at System institutions.

Text of Comment Letter
May 18, 2014

Mr. Barry F. Mardock
Deputy Director
Office of Regulatory Policy
Farm Credit Administration
1501 Farm Credit Drive
McLean, VA 22102-5090

Dear Mr. Mardock:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on FCA's recent proposed rule regarding Standards of Conduct. Adherence to appropriate Standards of Conduct is important to the integrity of the Farm Credit System and a topic which should be carefully considered. The FCA’s proposed rule, however, does far more harm than good and should be substantially revised.

As a director of Frontier Farm Credit, ACA, I find that the disclosure requirements in theConflicts of Interest section of the proposed rule to be entirely inappropriate and completely unrealistic. The proposed rule ignores my association’s cooperative structure and the way I do business in my own operation. I routinely have business transactions with a wide variety of individuals, some of whom might be Frontier’s customers. For the most part, I don’t know whether someone I’m doing business with is a Frontier customer. Even in instances where I know I’m dealing with an association customer, there is no conflict of interest since directors atFrontier Farm Credit do not have any role in approving loans or the terms of loans.

Requiring me to disclose in any transaction with a customer, even when I know I am doing business with a customer, is not realistic. The number of transactions I have in the normal course of my business means that both the staff at Frontier Farm Credit and I would spend anenormous amount of time shuffling paperwork with absolutely no impact on any conflict of interest. Perhaps most importantly, the proposal will immediately discourage qualified individuals from serving on the board of their association.

There are numerous examples that could be provided by all of our directors. One that I would mention is the purchase of seed for my own operation. These purchases are regularly made from local seed dealers, who are often farmers themselves and therefore could likely be customers of Frontier Farm Credit. The requirement for me to get advance approval of a purchase when I’m in the field trying to complete planting is simply unreasonable and cumbersome. Even if the association set a high “material” limit, the purchase of almost any piece of equipment would likely exceed that. The last thing I need is to have yet another person involved in approving the purchase of an item of equipment I need for my operation. The disclosure of every transaction, done in the ordinary course of my business, with another customer of Frontier Farm Credit seems very burdensome and unproductive, and does nothing to change the risk profile of the association.

I urge the FCA to revise the proposed rule substantially prior to issuing a final rule. I would also like to offer my support for the comments submitted by Frontier Farm Credit, CoBank, and the Farm Credit Council. Thank you for your consideration.


Gerald Gerstner
300 East 10th Street
Frankfort, KS 66427

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, private or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and delete this e-mail and the reply from your files. Thank you.