Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Return to Comments
Standards of Conduct--Reproposed NPRM
Type: Regulation
Federal Register Document Type: Reproposed
Description:
Revise existing standards of conduct regulations in Subpart A, Part 612, and consider a more principle-based rule to facilitate a sound standards of conduct program at System institutions.


Text of Comment Letter
Text of Comment Letter
July 2, 2014

Mr. Barry F. Mardock
Deputy Director
Office of Regulatory Policy
Farm Credit Administration
1501 Farm Credit Drive
McLean, VA 22102-5090

Dear Mr. Mardock:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on FCA's recent proposed rule regarding Standards of Conduct. Adherence to appropriate Standards of Conduct is important to the integrity of the Farm Credit System and a topic which should be carefully considered. The FCA’s proposed rule, however, does far more harm than good and should be substantially revised.

As a director of Farm Credit West (“FCW”), I find the transaction disclosure requirements in the Conflicts of Interest section of the proposed rule to be entirely inappropriate and completely unrealistic. The transactions coming under the reporting and approval requirement include any transaction where I would buy and sell product from and to approximately ten growers that are FCW customers six days per week, fifty two weeks per year as needed per contract or open market pricing. The proposed rule ignores my association’s cooperative structure and the way I do business in my own ag operation. I routinely have business transactions with a wide variety of individuals, some of whom might be FCW customers. Even in instances where I know I’m dealing with an association customer, there is no conflict of interest since FCW directors do not have any role in approving loans or the terms of loans.

FCA’s proposed transaction disclosure requirements could create significant issues for my business. The transaction disclosure requirements would force me to establish an infrastructure within my business to track and report every transaction I had with an FCW borrower that came within the “transactions” described in the proposed regulations. This results in additional burden and risk, along with associated costs, that my business would have trouble handling. Additionally, this transaction reporting requirement could potentially impact the viability of my business. If other FCW borrowers know that my transactions with them have to be reported, they likely will choose to do business elsewhere. As a fellow grower, I would feel obligated to advise them that I must report their transactions with me to FCW as required by federal law. Why would they be willing to continue to do business with me when there is no confidentiality regarding their business transactions? In today’s culture, the last thing a person is going to understand and tolerate is what will be perceived as “surveillance” of their business transactions. As a result, the transaction disclosure requirements could have severe impact on my business.

Requiring me to disclose transactions with FCW borrowers, even when I am doing business with one, is unrealistic and unworkable. The number of transactions I have in the normal course of my business means that both FCW and I would spend an enormous amount of time shuffling paperwork with absolutely no impact on any conflict of interest. Furthermore, the proposed transaction disclosure requirements impose an onerous burden on directors which will discourage qualified individuals from seeking to serve on the FCW board. I do know which suppliers are FCW customers. However, I do not know if they are FCW customers when they do business with FCW through a different entity then their operating company.

I urge the FCA to revise the proposed rule substantially prior to issuing a final rule. I would also like to offer my support for the comments submitted by FCW. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Case Van Wingerden
Director Farm Credit West 

Attachments: