November 15, 2019
Mr. Barry F. Mardock
Office of Regulatory Policy
Farm Credit Administration
1501 Farm Credit Drive
McLean, VA 22102-5090
Dear Mr. Mardock:
I am writing to express my views as a New Mexico community banker on the Farm Credit Administration’s (FCA) proposal to allow Farm Credit System (FCS) institutions to purchase and hold the guaranteed portion of
USDA loans that are originated by non-FCS lenders. These non-FCS lenders would largely be community banks like ours.
Our bank is located in the frontier part of Southwestern New Mexico since 1907. We have financed farmers and ranchers for over 112 years…..longer than the existence of the FCA and FCS. Our bank originates USDA,
FSA Guaranteed loans in both New Mexico and Arizona to corn producers, cotton producers, orchards, cattle ranches, dairies, small vineyards, chile producers, onion producers and a variety of other primary agricultural family businesses in the rural southwest.
We use the Farmer Mac 2 program to mitigate interest rate risk to our bank for many of our guaranteed loans.
I oppose FCA’s proposal. FCA’s proposal allows the FCS to duplicate the activities of Farmer Mac, established by Congress as the secondary market for farm real estate and USDA loan guarantees. Allowing the FCS,
a much larger financial network, to mirror key aspects of Farmer Mac’s activities, would allow FCS to undermine Farmer Mac’s secondary market activities. This will financially harm hundreds of community banks and to thousands of rural borrowers.
The FCS would easily be able to offer discounts to Farmer Mac’s rate sheets in an effort to lowball Farmer Mac pricing or cherry pick desired loans. The secondary market is and will be quite robust without the
FCS seeking to compete as an alternative secondary market provider. There already exist an adequate number of loan purchasers in the market without needing FCS’s presence. I fail to see in FCA’s proposed rule any efforts FCA would undertake to protect Farmer
Mac from the cutthroat and below market pricing activities of FCS institutions or even an effort to closely monitor such FCS activities on an ongoing basis.
In order to prevent the problems this proposal would cause if adopted, I suggest FCA withdraw the proposed rule or at least require FCS institutions to buy the guaranteed portion of such loans only from Farmer
Mac or sell the guaranteed portion of USDA loans that FCS originates to Farmer Mac. This approach would actually enhance the secondary market while preventing FCS from taking control of the secondary market and would minimize disruptive behavior by FCS lenders
seeking to manipulate the secondary market. FCA is also supposed to protect the interests of Farmer Mac, which it also regulates.
Thank you for considering my recommendations.
Michael R Martin
Chairman and CEO
140 E Motel Dr
Lordsburg, NM 88045
“Making a Difference Where we Live and Work”
Visit our website: www.bootheelbank.com
"This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The views and opinions expressed are mine only and do not reflect the views or opinion of my employer. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender
and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you."